Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClarkHuot/Cocoon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ClarkHuot/Cocoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No suggestion anywhere of notability, even under WP:CORP. As it sits, it's barely a business directory listing, contrary to WP:NOTDIRECTORY (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - spectacularly fails WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 13:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only possible way for the sources to be less reliable to establish notability, is if they were written in crayon. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for above reasons. tedder (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the “What Wikipedia is Not,” rules, the article is written a neutral tone; all information is verifiable through the citations provided; third-party sources listed are perfectly credible, including Marketing Magazine, the Winnipeg Free Press, Design Edge Canada, and more; with an office in New York and in Winnipeg, Canada (the largest agency in Winnipeg), ClarkHuot is not a “garage” company. With regard to relevancy, the article is perfectly relevant to businesses and organizations in Canada and the U.S. The article is also on par with other current Canadian advertising company pages, such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleublancrouge http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_North_Communications http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trampoline_(advertising_agency) Open to productive suggestions on how this could be improved. 209.177.103.146 (talk) 20:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC) — 209.177.103.146 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Should probably be noted that the account that created this is now confirmed as a sockmaster, and a paid group account. 86.** IP (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's helpful if you provide the links/diffs when you give that info ;) And yes, you are 100% correct. User:Expewikiwriter, who created it here [1]. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.